Verified Auction Sales · PSA Population Data · Updated Monthly · Editorial Policy
Wooden ruler on a white surface, the kind used to check card centering

CGC 9.5 to PSA 10 Crossover: Label Era, Centering and the Odds by Card

by

Whether a CGC 9.5 to PSA 10 crossover makes sense starts with the label, not the card. A slab printed before July 11, 2023 with the words Gem Mint 9.5 on it counts, by CGC’s own rule, as a Gem Mint 10 now; the newer Mint+ 9.5 label sits one step below that. For the current Mint+ 9.5, our comparison of CGC and PSA population reports on nine cards gives answers from none of the slice reaching PSA 10 territory (most vintage English holos and two big modern cards) to all of it (both Umbreon VMAX alt arts and the Japanese Base Charizard). No grader publishes crossover pass rates, so every odds figure here is Pokemon Pricing’s estimate.

As of October 23, 2026: PSA has no 9.5 grade, so a crossed 9.5 becomes either a PSA 10 or something lower. PSA charges its full fee even when your minimum is not met. CGC’s population report now files older slabs under today’s labels.

First check: which kind of CGC 9.5 is in your hand?

In 2023 CGC folded CSG and its own trading card arm into a single brand, CGC Cards, with the new services live from July 11, 2023. The top of the scale was renamed in the process. Its announcement was blunt: “Cards previously graded Gem Mint 9.5 are exactly equivalent to Gem Mint 10 under the updated grading scale”. The reasoning it gave was about matching rivals: “It does not make sense that a Gem Mint 9.5 at one grading service equates to a Gem Mint 10 at another grading service.”

So there are two different cards called a CGC 9.5:

  • Old label, GEM MINT 9.5 (CGC Trading Cards or CSG holders). CGC now counts these as Gem Mint 10s. Its legacy grade key maps the old CGC Trading Cards 9.5 onto the new Gem Mint 10, and a slab sent in for CGC’s ReHolder service is relabelled automatically: “All cards submitted for ReHolder with a Gem Mint 9.5 grade automatically convert to the CGC Cards Gem Mint 10 grade.” ReHolder was listed at $10 a card on October 23, 2026, with the grade itself left unchanged.
  • Current label, MINT+ 9.5. This is the grade between Mint 9 and Gem Mint 10 on today’s scale, and it is the one the rest of this page is about.

An old Gem Mint 9.5 heading for PSA is really a Gem Mint 10 crossover, covered in CGC Gem Mint 10 to PSA 10. Sending it to CGC for a new holder first will not change the card, but it changes what a buyer reads on the label; our reholdering explainer covers that difference.

Old-label sales show why this matters. In an auction ending 10/06/22, Goldin sold a Thin Stamp 1st Edition Charizard whose slab read GEM MINT 9.5 for $36,600 including buyer’s premium; the lot description called it one of five at that tier with none higher. Under the 2023 rule that slab is a Gem Mint 10 today, so using it as a price for a Mint+ 9.5 would be wrong.

Centering: the one thing a Mint+ 9.5 usually gets right

CGC publishes no centering number for Mint+ 9.5. It describes the grade as “a card that displays premium eye appeal for a Mint card”, and adds: “Qualities such as exceptional centering, surface qualities/color or other key elements can elevate a card to a Mint+ grade.” In other words, a Mint+ 9.5 is often a 9 with something notably good about it, and centering is the first example CGC gives.

The grade above it has a hard number. CGC’s Gem Mint 10 says: “Centering is not to exceed approximately 55/45, and reverse centering is not to exceed 75/25.” PSA’s 10 uses the same pair of limits. That gives a quick self-check with a centering tool or a scan:

  • Your 9.5 measures worse than 55/45 on the front. That alone may be why CGC stopped short of 10, and PSA’s 10 has the same ceiling. PSA’s standards do allow a little leeway, “At the grader’s sole discretion”, for eye appeal, but that is a hope, not a plan.
  • Your 9.5 measures inside 55/45 and 75/25. Then CGC held it back for something else: a corner, an edge, a print line or a surface mark. PSA will grade that same flaw. This is the case where a crossover at a 10 minimum has a real argument, because PSA’s 10 leaves room for “a slight printing imperfection, if it doesn’t impair the overall appeal of the card.”

Every grade and centering limit across five graders sits side by side in our scale comparison for CGC and PSA.

CGC 9.5 to PSA 10 by the population numbers

Here is how we built the odds. For each card we ranked CGC’s numerically graded slabs from the top and found where the Mint+ 9.5s sit: the share graded higher than 9.5, and the share at 9.5 or better. We then checked how much of that slice falls inside PSA’s 10 share for the same card. The CGC side is today’s report (October 23, 2026). The PSA side is older: archived snapshots taken between April 2025 and March 2026, because PSA’s live report sits behind a login.

Card CGC Mint+ 9.5s (of numeric slabs) CGC 9.5 slice PSA 10 share Slice inside PSA 10 share
Unlimited Base Set Charizard 150 of 14,779 2.0% to 3.0% 0.5% none: the slice ranks with PSA 9s
Unlimited Base Set Mewtwo 88 of 7,270 2.4% to 3.6% 2.6% 18.0%
1st Edition Base Set Blastoise 14 of 557 4.7% to 7.2% 2.8% none: the slice ranks with PSA 9s
1st Edition Base Set Venusaur 9 of 508 6.1% to 7.9% 4.4% none: the slice ranks with PSA 9s
1996 Japanese Base Charizard 33 of 3,186 4.3% to 5.4% 6.0% all of it
2023 Charizard ex SIR (151) 868 of 6,212 34.5% to 48.5% 32.9% none: the slice ranks with PSA 9s
2023 Van Gogh Museum Pikachu promo 1,108 of 7,438 53.4% to 68.3% 44.9% none: the slice ranks with PSA 9s
2021 Umbreon VMAX alt art (Evolving Skies) 128 of 3,120 55.9% to 60.0% 72.5% all of it
2021 Japanese Umbreon VMAX (Eevee Heroes 095) 5 of 242 72.3% to 74.4% 87.0% all of it

Three patterns stand out. First, the 9.5 slice is thin on vintage cards: 150 Mint+ 9.5s out of 14,779 numerically graded Unlimited Charizards. Second, on most 1999 English holos PSA hands out proportionally fewer 10s than CGC hands out Gem Mint 10s and better, which leaves CGC’s 9.5s ranked alongside PSA 9s. Unlimited Mewtwo is the borderline case, with 18.0% of the slice overlapping PSA 10s.

Third, the modern results split in two. The Charizard ex SIR from 151 and the Van Gogh promo Pikachu carry huge CGC 10 counts (1,906 and 3,176 Gem Mint 10s respectively), so their 9.5s fall below PSA’s 10 line. On the two Umbreon VMAX alt arts and the Japanese Base Charizard, PSA’s 10 share is wider than everything CGC grades 9.5 or better, so the whole 9.5 slice ranks with PSA 10s.

Our estimate for a CGC Mint+ 9.5 at a PSA 10 minimum

Our estimate, labelled as such: on a 1999 English Base Set holo, a CGC Mint+ 9.5 crossing at a 10 minimum is a long shot, somewhere between none and about one in five on the population evidence (the Mewtwo figure is the top of that range). On cards where PSA 10 is the usual result, such as the two Umbreons, the population evidence puts most Mint+ 9.5s in PSA 10 territory. Those are rank comparisons, and four things move a real submission away from them:

  • Rank is not a grade. A PSA grader looks at your card, not at where CGC’s population puts it.
  • The two pools of submitted cards are different and unmeasured. PSA tends to see more cards that owners expect to gem.
  • People only cross a 9.5 they think is a 10, which pushes real results above a blind average for that card.
  • Centering is the only criterion where the two published standards can be lined up number for number, and only at the 10 level.

Minimum grade: 10, or accept the PSA 9?

PSA’s crossover form requires a minimum grade. If PSA’s grade falls short, the card goes back in its CGC slab and the fee is still due; PSA spells it out: “Full grading fee is charged even if item does not meet minimum grade.” With no 9.5 on PSA’s scale, a Mint+ 9.5 has only two sensible minimums:

  • Minimum 10. Two outcomes only: a PSA 10, or the same CGC Mint+ 9.5 back in the mail. The fee is the whole downside.
  • Minimum 9. You also accept a PSA 9, which on many cards sells for far less than a PSA 10. That trade is analysed in CGC 9.5 to PSA 9.

How minimum grades work across the different services is in our minimum grade guide.

What is at stake: the gap between a PSA 10 and a PSA 9

Price data for current Mint+ 9.5 slabs is thin. In the Goldin results we collected, the only clean Mint+ 9.5 sale is a Mega Charizard X ex #223, from the 2025 Japanese Mega Dream ex set, at $55 (auction ending 9/27/26). The same evening a CGC Gem Mint 10 of that card brought $94, and in June a CGC Pristine 10 sold for $149. That is CGC’s own ladder priced by one buyer at a time; no PSA sale of that card was captured.

For the stakes on a crossover we can look at the PSA side. An Evolving Skies Umbreon VMAX 215 sold at Goldin as a PSA 10 for $4,087 (8/09/26) and as a PSA 9 for $2,257 (6/28/26), a gap of $1,830 between single sales seven weeks apart. Both figures include Goldin’s buyer’s premium of 22% ($19 minimum).

Worked example with an assumed 9.5 value

We have no Goldin sale of a Mint+ 9.5 Umbreon 215, so for this example we make an assumption: the CGC Mint+ 9.5 is worth $2,000. As a PSA 10 the card would be worth about $4,087, above Express’s $2,500 insured limit, so it belongs in Super Express at $349.00 (insured to $5,000). PSA’s FAQ says that if a graded card’s value tops the tier limit, “PSA will upgrade the service level for that item”.

Line Figure Where it comes from
CGC Mint+ 9.5 value $2,000 Assumption for this example
PSA 10 value $4,087 Goldin, auction ending 8/09/26
Gain if it crosses $2,087 Our arithmetic
PSA Super Express fee $349.00 PSA price list, read October 23, 2026
Chance needed to break even 16.7% Fee divided by the gain

The example leaves out shipping, insurance and selling costs. On the population comparison, an Umbreon 215 Mint+ 9.5 ranks inside PSA’s 10 share, comfortably above that one-in-six line. Change the card to a Base Set Unlimited Charizard and the same arithmetic meets a population slice that ranks with PSA 9s instead.

Every grade pair, from 7.5 up to Pristine, is collected on the hub page for crossover grading, with each grader’s fees beside it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a CGC 9.5 a PSA 10?

Not as a rule. The pre-July 2023 Gem Mint 9.5 label is treated by CGC as its Gem Mint 10 now. The Mint+ 9.5 handed out since then is a grade lower, and because PSA has no 9.5, it becomes a PSA 10 only if a PSA grader calls it a 10.

What does CGC Mint+ 9.5 mean?

It is the grade between Mint 9 and Gem Mint 10 on the current CGC Cards scale, given to a Mint card with premium eye appeal, for example exceptional centering. CGC publishes no centering number for it.

Should I reholder an old CGC Gem Mint 9.5 before selling?

That is a choice about the label, not the grade. CGC says a Gem Mint 9.5 sent for ReHolder converts automatically to the Gem Mint 10 label, and its ReHolder service was listed at $10 per card on October 23, 2026.

What centering does a PSA 10 need?

About 55/45 across the face and 75/25 across the back, per PSA. CGC prints the same two limits for its Gem Mint 10.

What happens if my CGC 9.5 comes back a PSA 9?

If you set the minimum at 10, the card is not cracked: PSA returns it in the CGC slab and keeps the full fee. If you set the minimum at 9, you get a PSA 9.

Do CGC population reports count old 9.5 labels as 10s?

Yes. CGC states that its population report counts reflect the current grading scale, so legacy Gem Mint 9.5 slabs appear in the Gem Mint 10 column.

Sources

No grading company publishes crossover pass rates. Any crossover odds on this page are Pokemon Pricing’s estimate, labelled as one, built from the published grading standards and population reports on the dates shown. Fees, populations and sale prices change; check the grading company’s current price list before submitting. This article is collector information, not investment advice. Pokémon and all card names are trademarks of Nintendo, Creatures Inc. and GAME FREAK inc.; Pokemon Pricing is not affiliated with them or with any grading company.

Owed money from a settlement? Check what is open at OpenClassActions.com. Caring for someone with dementia? Find practical guides at HelpDementia.com. Working out a skin routine? Evidence-based answers at AcneAdvocate.com. Forgot the name of a movie? Identify it at FindThisMovie.com. Was your data exposed? Track active breaches at DataBreachRadar.com.

We use cookies to run this site, measure how it’s used, and show ads. Choose “Essentials only” to limit cookies to what the site needs to work. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy.