The Scizor from the 2003 Skyridge set is card #119/144, a non-holo Rare, and based on the most reliable card-list data available it sits at roughly $7.48 ungraded for a standard near-mint copy. That figure comes from TCG Collector’s tracked value for the card, and it is the most concrete number I can point to for the plain non-holo version. If you are searching “Price Charting for Skyridge Scizor Non-Holo,” that single-digit dollar range is your anchor for a loose, ungraded card in average condition. A quick word of caution before going further: the exact live “Price Charting” dollar figure for this specific card could not be confirmed from current search data, and several search results mix this card up with completely different Scizor printings.
The Skyridge non-holo #119 is not the same as Scizor-EX #119 from BREAKpoint, Scizor VMAX #119 from Darkness Ablaze, Scizor #141 from Obsidian Flames, or the original Scizor #10 from Neo Discovery. Those are separate cards with separate values, and pulling a number from one to price the other is the most common mistake collectors make here. For an accurate read, the best practice is to cross-reference TCGplayer’s Skyridge price guide, PSA’s 2003 Skyridge graded guide, and recent eBay sold listings for the 119/144 print rather than trusting a single aggregator number. An eBay listing for the 119/144 Scizor confirms the non-holo Rare format, which is a useful identity check before you ever look at price.
Table of Contents
- What Does “Price Charting for Skyridge Scizor Non-Holo” Actually Tell You?
- Identifying the Skyridge Scizor #119/144 Before You Trust Any Price
- How the Non-Holo Compares to Other Scizor Cards Collectors Confuse It With
- Where to Pull a Live Number, and the Tradeoffs of Each Source
- Common Pitfalls and Data Gaps With This Card’s Pricing
- Does Grading the Skyridge Non-Holo Scizor Make Sense?
- The Reverse-Holo Parallel as a Separate Pricing Track
- Frequently Asked Questions
What Does “Price Charting for Skyridge Scizor Non-Holo” Actually Tell You?
price-charting tools are designed to give you a single representative value for a card based on recent sales, but for a card like Skyridge Scizor #119 that number is only as good as the data feeding it. The verifiable anchor here is TCG Collector’s roughly $7.48 ungraded value. That tells you the plain non-holo, in collectible-but-not-graded condition, lives in the high single digits rather than the tens or hundreds. The reason that matters is volume.
Skyridge non-holo rares do not trade as frequently as marquee holos like the set’s Charizard or Crystal cards, so any “charted” price can be built on a thin sample. When only a handful of copies sell in a given month, one unusually high or low sale can drag the average noticeably. Compare that to a heavily traded modern card like Scizor VMAX from Darkness Ablaze, where hundreds of sales smooth out the curve and a charted price is far more stable. So treat the $7.48 figure as a center of gravity, not a guarantee. If you see a listing at $4 or one at $15, neither is necessarily wrong for this card; they may simply reflect condition, shipping, or a quiet week with few comparable sales.
Identifying the Skyridge Scizor #119/144 Before You Trust Any Price
The single most important step is confirming you are looking at the right card. Skyridge Scizor is #119/144 from the 2003 e-Card series, marked as a non-holo Rare. The e-Card era cards carry a distinctive dot-code strip along the bottom border, which is one of the quickest ways to confirm the card is genuinely from this set and not a reprint or a different Scizor entirely. Here is the important limitation: like other Skyridge rares, Scizor #119 also exists in a reverse-holo parallel version.
The reverse holo is a different product with a different value, and aggregator pages do not always separate the two cleanly. If a price looks oddly high for a “non-holo,” double-check that the listing or chart is not actually quoting the reverse-holo parallel, because the shimmer on the card body is easy to miss in a low-resolution photo. The warning extends to graded data too. PSA maintains a price guide for 2003 Skyridge graded cards, but a PSA 9 or PSA 10 non-holo Scizor can sell for a multiple of the raw $7.48 figure. Mixing a graded comp into a raw-card valuation will inflate your expectations every time.
How the Non-Holo Compares to Other Scizor Cards Collectors Confuse It With
The clearest way to understand this card’s value is to see what it is not. Search engines routinely surface Scizor-EX #119 from BREAKpoint, Scizor VMAX #119 from Darkness Ablaze, Scizor #141 from Obsidian Flames, and Scizor #10 from Neo Discovery when you look for the Skyridge card. The shared “#119” number on two of those is a coincidence of set numbering, not a sign they are related. As a concrete example, the Scizor VMAX from Darkness Ablaze is a full-art-style modern ultra rare with its own market entirely, and its graded copies have historically traded well above the raw value of the 2003 Skyridge non-holo.
If you accidentally price your Skyridge Scizor off a VMAX comp, you could overvalue it by a wide margin and list it at a price that never sells. The fix is mechanical: always verify the set name (Skyridge), the card number (119/144), the year (2003), and the rarity (non-holo Rare) together. All four need to match. A single matching field, like the number 119, is not enough to trust a price.
Where to Pull a Live Number, and the Tradeoffs of Each Source
For an actual current price, three sources are worth cross-checking. TCGplayer’s Skyridge price guide tracks this card directly and reflects active marketplace listings; the tradeoff is that its market number can lag during slow trading periods when few copies are listed. PSA’s 2003 Skyridge guide is excellent for graded copies but tells you little about a raw card you intend to sell ungraded. eBay sold listings sit at the other end of the spectrum. They give you the truest picture of what real buyers actually paid, including shipping, but they require manual work and judgment.
You have to filter for the exact 119/144 non-holo, ignore the reverse-holo parallels, and discard any obviously misidentified listings. The upside is that no aggregator beats a verified sold comp for accuracy on a thinly traded card. The practical tradeoff is speed versus reliability. A charting tool gives you one number in seconds but may be built on stale or mixed data; eBay sold comps take longer but reflect reality. For a card in the high-single-digit range like this Scizor, the difference between sources may only be a few dollars, so match your effort to the stakes.
Common Pitfalls and Data Gaps With This Card’s Pricing
The biggest gap is transparency. The specific current “Price Charting” dollar figure for the non-holo Scizor #119 could not be confirmed from available search data, and the TCGplayer market number for this exact card did not surface in search snippets either. That absence is itself useful information: it means you should not quote a precise charted figure with confidence and should instead verify against live listings before buying or selling. A second pitfall is recency. No price movement or news specific to this card was found within the last week, so any figure you see is likely carrying over from older sales.
For a low-volume card, that is normal, but it means a “current” price may actually reflect a sale from weeks or months ago. Do not assume the listed value updated yesterday. Finally, beware condition blind spots. The $7.48 anchor assumes a presentable near-mint raw card. e-Card era cards are now over twenty years old, and edge wear, surface scratches, or whitening on the dark borders can pull a real-world sale well below that figure. A heavily played copy is not a $7 card no matter what any chart says.
Does Grading the Skyridge Non-Holo Scizor Make Sense?
Grading only pays off when the graded premium clears the cost of submission. With a raw value near $7.48, a non-holo Scizor #119 needs to grade high to justify the fee, and PSA’s Skyridge guide is where you would check whether a 9 or 10 commands enough of a premium.
For most copies with any visible wear, the math does not favor grading, and you are better off selling raw. As an example, if grading and shipping costs more than the raw card is worth, only a near-perfect copy with a realistic shot at a gem grade makes the gamble worthwhile. A mid-grade result on a single-digit card often leaves you underwater after fees.
The Reverse-Holo Parallel as a Separate Pricing Track
Because Skyridge Scizor #119 also exists as a reverse-holo parallel, that version trades on its own track and should never be folded into the non-holo’s value. Reverse holos from Skyridge are generally scarcer than their plain counterparts, which can push their prices higher, so a chart that quietly mixes the two will distort the non-holo figure upward.
If you are specifically valuing the non-holo, filter it out deliberately. Confirm the card body has no reverse-holo shimmer, match it to the standard 119/144 non-holo Rare listing, and price it against other plain copies only. Pokecardvalues.co.uk’s Skyridge set page is one reference that documents both the base and reverse-holo versions side by side, which makes it easier to keep the two straight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Skyridge Scizor’s card number?
It is #119/144, a non-holo Rare from the 2003 e-Card series Skyridge set.
How much is the non-holo Scizor #119 worth?
TCG Collector lists it around $7.48 ungraded for a presentable copy, though exact live figures vary by source and condition.
Is there a holo version of this Scizor?
There is no standard holo, but a reverse-holo parallel exists and trades at a different, usually higher value.
Why do prices for “Scizor #119” vary so wildly online?
Because Scizor-EX #119 (BREAKpoint) and Scizor VMAX #119 (Darkness Ablaze) share the number but are entirely different, more valuable cards.
Where should I check the current price?
Cross-reference TCGplayer’s Skyridge guide, PSA’s 2003 Skyridge graded guide, and recent eBay sold listings for the 119/144 non-holo.
Should I grade my copy?
Usually only if it is near-flawless, since the raw single-digit value rarely justifies grading fees on a worn card.
