Wurmple from the EX Ruby & Sapphire set is a 2003 Common, non-holo card whose value sits in the low single-dollar range for a raw, played copy. If you searched for “Wurmple 62/109,” note that the collector number is wrong: the verified card number for this Wurmple is 78/109, not 62/109. Card 62/109 in the same set is a different Pokemon entirely. That distinction matters before you check any price guide, because pulling the wrong number is the fastest way to end up looking at the value of an unrelated card.
So the direct answer is this: a raw EX Ruby & Sapphire Wurmple #78/109 trades for a few dollars at most in played-to-near-mint condition, while graded examples carry a premium that depends entirely on the assigned grade. For example, a BGS 8.5 copy of the 2003 EX Ruby & Sapphire Wurmple #078/109 is tracked separately in graded-card price guides, which is where the meaningful price separation between raw and slabbed copies shows up. Because this is one of the most common cards from a 109-card set released in 2003, supply is plentiful and the entry cost is low. That makes it an easy card to acquire, but it also limits how much price-tracking effort the card rewards. The sections below walk through where the numbers come from and how to read them.
Table of Contents
- Why does price charting for EX Ruby and Sapphire Wurmple start with the right card number?
- How much is a raw EX Ruby and Sapphire Wurmple #78/109 worth?
- What does a graded Wurmple add to the price chart?
- Which price-charting sources should you use for Wurmple?
- What are the common pitfalls when tracking Wurmple’s price?
- How does Wurmple compare to other commons in EX Ruby and Sapphire?
- What makes the 2003 EX Ruby and Sapphire set context matter for Wurmple?
- Frequently Asked Questions
Why does price charting for EX Ruby and Sapphire Wurmple start with the right card number?
price charting only works when you are tracking the correct card, and Wurmple is a textbook case of why the number matters. The verified identity is Wurmple #78/109, a Common, non-holo card from the EX Ruby & Sapphire set. Sources including TCGplayer’s product listing and CardTrader’s catalog both confirm the 78/109 designation. If you search a price guide for “62/109,” you will be looking at a different Pokemon, and any price you copy down will be meaningless for your Wurmple. This is more than a clerical detail.
A grading service slabs the card with its full identifier, which is why Sports Card Investor tracks a graded copy as “2003 EX Ruby & Sapphire Base 078/109.” That 078/109 string is the anchor for every comparable sale. Enter the wrong number into a search field and you break the chain of comparables that price charting depends on. As a comparison, consider how this plays out against a holo or rare card from the same set. With a rare, a wrong card number usually produces an obviously wrong price, so the mistake is easy to catch. With a Common like Wurmple, both the right card and the wrong card may sit in the same low-dollar range, so a number error can slip through unnoticed and quietly distort your records.
How much is a raw EX Ruby and Sapphire Wurmple #78/109 worth?
As a Common from a 2003 set, raw Wurmple #78/109 trades in the low single-dollar range. Listings appear on the TCGplayer Ruby & Sapphire price guide and on eBay, where moderately-played non-holo copies turn up regularly. The card was printed in large quantities as a basic evolution-line filler, so there is no scarcity premium pushing the raw price upward. The practical limitation here is that low-value Commons are heavily influenced by shipping costs and listing minimums rather than the card itself.
A Wurmple that “sells” for a couple of dollars may carry shipping that exceeds the card’s value, which distorts what the raw market price actually represents. When you see a single eBay listing, treat it as one data point, not a settled market rate, because a lone listing for a sub-five-dollar Common can sit unsold for a long time without telling you anything reliable. Be cautious about reading too much into any single asking price. Asking prices are what a seller hopes to get; sold prices are what buyers actually paid. For a card this common, the gap between the two can be large, and only completed sales give you a defensible number for a collection spreadsheet or an insurance estimate.
What does a graded Wurmple add to the price chart?
Grading is where Wurmple’s price chart gains its only meaningful spread. A BGS 8.5 copy of the 2003 EX Ruby & sapphire wurmple #078/109 is tracked in graded-card price guides such as Sports Card Investor, separate from the raw market. The slab, the grade, and the certified card number together create a distinct comparable set that does not overlap with loose, ungraded copies. The specific example worth noting is that BGS 8.5 grade.
Beckett’s 8.5 sits just below the gem-mint tier, so it represents a high-quality but not flawless copy. For a Common from 2003, the grading and slabbing cost can easily exceed the raw card’s value many times over, which is the central tension with grading inexpensive cards: you may spend more to certify the card than the certified card is worth on resale. That does not make grading pointless, but it does narrow the rationale. Collectors typically grade a Common like Wurmple to complete a fully-graded set, to preserve a personally meaningful copy, or to chase a perfect gem-mint example, not because they expect the slab to turn a profit. Price charting a graded Wurmple is therefore most useful for set-completion planning rather than investment forecasting.
Which price-charting sources should you use for Wurmple?
For a card like Wurmple #78/109, the most useful sources fall into two groups: live marketplaces and graded-card guides. TCGplayer’s Ruby & Sapphire price guide and its individual product page give you the raw, ungraded market, while eBay completed listings show real-world sold prices. CardTrader is useful for confirming the card’s identity and seeing European listings. For slabbed copies, Sports Card Investor tracks graded examples like the BGS 8.5 by their full 078/109 identifier. The tradeoff between these sources is freshness versus stability.
Marketplace data like TCGplayer and eBay updates constantly and reflects what the card is doing right now, but for a thinly-traded Common it can be noisy, with long gaps between sales. Graded-guide data is more stable and structured, but it covers only the slabbed population, which is a tiny fraction of all the Wurmples in existence. Relying on one without the other gives you an incomplete picture. A reasonable workflow is to confirm the card number first using a catalog source like CardTrader or Pokellector, then check raw value on TCGplayer and eBay sold listings, and finally consult a graded guide only if your copy is slabbed or you are considering grading. Skipping the identity-confirmation step is the most common way collectors end up charting the wrong card, especially given the 62/109 versus 78/109 confusion attached to this particular Wurmple.
What are the common pitfalls when tracking Wurmple’s price?
The first and largest pitfall is the wrong card number. Because the query for this card frequently appears as “62/109,” collectors risk pulling prices for an unrelated Pokemon. Always verify against 78/109 before recording any figure. Pokellector’s EX Ruby & Sapphire set list, which confirms the 109-card count and the 2003 release, is a quick way to cross-check the number. A second pitfall is conflating raw and graded values. A few-dollar raw price and a graded slab price are not interchangeable, and averaging them together produces a meaningless number.
Keep the two populations separate in any record you maintain. A related warning: do not assume a high grade multiplies the raw price by a fixed factor, because grade premiums for Commons are inconsistent and depend on how many copies have been submitted at each grade level. The third pitfall is thin data. Commons from a two-decade-old set do not sell every day, so a price chart may rest on only a handful of sales spread over months. With so few data points, a single unusual sale, whether an overpay or a giveaway-priced lot, can skew the apparent average dramatically. Treat any Wurmple price as an approximate band rather than a precise figure, and weight recent completed sales over stale or one-off listings.
How does Wurmple compare to other commons in EX Ruby and Sapphire?
Wurmple sits at the bottom of the value ladder within its 109-card set, alongside the other basic Commons. The set’s value is concentrated in its holo rares and EX cards, which is typical for early-2000s expansions, while basics like Wurmple serve as the high-supply, low-cost foundation of the set. For example, a collector assembling a complete EX Ruby & Sapphire set will usually acquire Wurmple and its fellow Commons in bulk lots for pennies each, then spend the bulk of their budget chasing the chase cards.
That dynamic is worth keeping in mind when you chart prices. Wurmple’s number will move very little over time, so frequent re-checking offers diminishing returns. The card’s role in a set is structural rather than speculative, and its price chart reflects that stability more than any market momentum.
What makes the 2003 EX Ruby and Sapphire set context matter for Wurmple?
EX Ruby & Sapphire was released in 2003 as the first set of the EX era, containing 109 cards. That historical position gives the set collector interest beyond the value of any single Common, because it marks the start of the EX mechanic in the Pokemon TCG.
Wurmple #78/109 carries that release-year context even though it is one of the set’s most ordinary cards. For price-charting purposes, the practical fact is that a 2003 print date means two decades of circulation, heavy supply, and a well-established secondary market. A copy graded and tracked as “2003 EX Ruby & Sapphire Base 078/109” inherits all of that context, which is exactly why a BGS 8.5 example appears in dedicated graded-card guides while the raw card stays in the low single-dollar range on TCGplayer and eBay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Wurmple card 62/109 or 78/109 in EX Ruby & Sapphire?
It is 78/109. Verified sources including TCGplayer and CardTrader confirm 78/109; card 62/109 in this set is a different Pokemon, so searching the wrong number returns unrelated prices.
How much is a raw EX Ruby & Sapphire Wurmple worth?
As a 2003 Common, non-holo card, it trades in the low single-dollar range. Listings appear on the TCGplayer Ruby & Sapphire price guide and on eBay, where played copies turn up regularly.
Is it worth grading a Wurmple from this set?
Usually only for set completion or personal reasons. Grading and slabbing costs typically exceed the raw card’s value, so a graded copy like the tracked BGS 8.5 rarely resells for a profit.
When was EX Ruby & Sapphire released and how many cards does it have?
It was released in 2003 and contains 109 cards. It was the first set of the EX era in the Pokemon TCG.
Where can I find a graded price for Wurmple?
Graded-card guides such as Sports Card Investor track examples like the BGS 8.5 copy by the full identifier 2003 EX Ruby & Sapphire Base 078/109.
