Ralts from the EX: Ruby & Sapphire set is a common, low-value card, and price charting data confirms that ungraded near-mint copies typically trade in the low single digits. One documented listing put a near-mint non-holo Ralts #66/109 at just $1.79, which is representative of where most copies of this card sit. Unlike the chase holographic cards from the 2003 set, Ralts was printed as a common, so its base printings carry little monetary weight on the secondary market. The wrinkle that price charting helps untangle is that Ralts appears three times in this set under three different collector numbers: #66/109, #67/109, and #68/109.
Each is a separate print variant, and at least one of them, #68, also has a reverse-holo version that commands a premium over the standard non-holo printing. So when someone asks what an EX Ruby & Sapphire Ralts is “worth,” the honest answer is that it depends entirely on which of the three numbers you hold and whether it is a standard or reverse-holo copy. For collectors, this means the card is less a financial asset and more a set-completion piece. Anyone trying to finish the 109-card EX: Ruby & Sapphire master set will need all three Ralts variants, and the reverse-holo printings are where the small amount of real demand concentrates.
Table of Contents
- What does price charting show for EX Ruby and Sapphire Ralts?
- Why exact card number and condition determine the real value
- The three Ralts variants and the reverse-holo premium
- How to use price charts before buying or selling a Ralts
- Common pitfalls when pricing graded and foreign Ralts
- Where Ralts fits in the 109-card EX Ruby and Sapphire set
- The Japanese EX Ruby and Sapphire Ralts as a separate market
- Frequently Asked Questions
What does price charting show for EX Ruby and Sapphire Ralts?
price charting for this card starts with identifying the exact variant, because the three collector numbers do not all trade at the same value. The standard non-holo printings of #66, #67, and #68 are the cheapest, with documented near-mint ungraded examples sitting around the $1.79 mark. These are the copies that flood bulk lots and dollar bins, and their charts tend to be nearly flat over time because supply far outstrips collector demand.
The comparison that matters is between the standard non-holo and the reverse-holo. The reverse-holo version of Ralts #68 is tracked as a separate variant and consistently commands a premium over the standard printing. The reverse-holo shimmer was a relatively new feature in the early 2000s, and reverse-holo commons from this era were pulled at lower rates than their non-holo counterparts, which is why a card that is “worthless” in one printing can be worth several times more in another. If you are reading a price chart and see two very different numbers for the same Pokemon, the variant label is almost always the explanation.
Why exact card number and condition determine the real value
The single biggest mistake collectors make with EX: Ruby & Sapphire Ralts is treating the three numbers as interchangeable. They are not. A price chart for #68/109 is not valid for #66/109, even though both show the same Pokemon from the same 2003 set. The artwork and print runs differ, and the secondary market prices them independently. Before trusting any figure, confirm the collector number printed in the bottom corner of the card.
The warning here is about data reliability. Vintage Pokemon pricing fluctuates daily and varies heavily by exact card number, condition, and grade. A “near-mint” label from one seller may not match another seller’s grading eye, and ungraded prices in particular are soft, negotiable, and inconsistent across marketplaces. A live product page, such as the TCGplayer listing for #68/109, can show a different lowest-listing price from one week to the next. Treat any single quoted dollar figure as a snapshot rather than a fixed value, and cross-reference multiple sources before buying or selling.
The three Ralts variants and the reverse-holo premium
To make this concrete: a collector building the master set opens a binder page and finds three slots labeled Ralts. The first is #66/109, the second #67/109, and the third #68/109. All three are commons, and all three in standard non-holo form can be acquired for a couple of dollars each. The Pokemon.com TCG database lists #68/109 directly, which is a useful reference point for confirming you are looking at the right card.
The reverse-holo of #68 is the variant worth flagging. Cardbase tracks it as a distinct entry with a value above the standard printing. For a set-completion collector, this is the one Ralts that may require a deliberate purchase rather than a bulk-lot pull, because reverse-holo commons surface less often and sellers price them accordingly. If your goal is a “complete” set that includes reverse-holo variants, budget for that single card to cost more than the other Ralts printings combined.
How to use price charts before buying or selling a Ralts
When you sit down to price a Ralts, the practical tradeoff is between speed and accuracy. The fast approach is to glance at a single aggregator number and accept it. The accurate approach is to confirm the collector number, confirm whether the card is standard or reverse-holo, and then compare at least two or three sources, since vintage commons often show wide spreads between marketplaces. The few extra minutes are worth it when the difference between variants can be several multiples of the base price.
There is also a tradeoff between graded and ungraded. For a card with an ungraded near-mint value near $1.79, paying $15 to $25 to have it professionally graded almost never makes financial sense. The grading fee alone exceeds the card’s value many times over, and even a strong grade will not transform a common into a high-value asset. Grading this card is justifiable only for sentimental reasons or for a registry-set collector who wants every slot filled with a graded copy.
Common pitfalls when pricing graded and foreign Ralts
Graded values for PSA, BGS, and CGC are estimates, not guarantees, and they can mislead newcomers. A high population of graded commons keeps even gem-mint examples affordable, and grades from lesser-known grading companies may be worth significantly less than the equivalent grade from an established firm. Do not assume that a slab automatically adds meaningful value to a 2003 common; in many cases the grading cost is never recovered on resale.
The second pitfall is mixing up the English and Japanese cards. A separate Japanese “EX Ruby & Sapphire Expansion Pack” Ralts exists, listed as #27, and it is priced independently from the English #68/109. Listings on Pokellector and CardTrader make this distinction clear, but a careless search can pull a Japanese price into an English valuation or vice versa. Always verify the language, set, and number together before accepting a chart figure as your card’s value.
Where Ralts fits in the 109-card EX Ruby and Sapphire set
EX: Ruby & Sapphire was released in 2003 as the first English “EX” series expansion, totaling 109 cards. Ralts, as a multi-printed common, is one of the building blocks of that set rather than a headline card.
Its role is structural: it fills three of the 109 numbered slots and serves as the evolution base for Kirlia and Gardevoir, which themselves carry more market interest in this set. For a collector chasing the full master set, Ralts is an easy and inexpensive acquisition in its standard printings, with the reverse-holo #68 standing as the only one of the three that requires any real effort or budget to track down.
The Japanese EX Ruby and Sapphire Ralts as a separate market
The Japanese release of this card occupies its own corner of the market. Listed as Ralts #27 in the Japanese “EX Ruby & Sapphire Expansion Pack,” it is cataloged and priced separately from the English #68/109 on sites like Pokellector and CardTrader.
Print runs, distribution, and collector demand differ between the Japanese and English markets, so the two charts rarely align. A buyer who specifically wants the Japanese card should search by the Japanese set name and the #27 number rather than the English collector numbers, since pulling up #66, #67, or #68 will return English-set data that does not apply to the Japanese printing.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many Ralts cards are in EX Ruby & Sapphire?
Three. Ralts appears as a common under collector numbers #66/109, #67/109, and #68/109, each a separate print variant in the 109-card set.
How much is an ungraded Ralts from this set worth?
Standard non-holo near-mint copies trade in the low single digits, with one documented #66/109 listing at $1.79. Values fluctuate daily and vary by exact number and condition.
Is the reverse-holo Ralts worth more?
Yes. The reverse-holo version of #68 is tracked as a separate variant and commands a premium over the standard non-holo printing.
Should I grade my EX Ruby & Sapphire Ralts?
Usually not. The grading fee far exceeds the card’s ungraded value, so grading is rarely worth it financially for a 2003 common.
Is the Japanese Ralts the same as the English one?
No. The Japanese “EX Ruby & Sapphire Expansion Pack” Ralts is #27 and is priced independently from the English #68/109.
